your clinic said that someone is sick, doesn't it seem unfair? It would have been ok if it was only at the clinic that was denied but life time which means you killed the person alive even though the truth is that he is not sick as your accredited clinic says. What if your clinic is really wrong and we really don't have the disease as the clinic declares, what about us? It is acceptable if all the medical results in different clinics/hospitals have the same findings, at least it proves that a person is really sick. The question is, if this is the policy of your clinics, what about us, even if we have proofs that we are disease-free, your clinic will not allow us to change and confirm the findings even if we go to expensive hospitals (st.likes or Asian hos.) they won't accept it.

We understand your protocol if a person is really sick and all the medical treatments done by him have the same result because anything found in medical abroad will be charged to the clinic that fitted. I tried to go to another accredited clinic but they explained that even if their findings are normal, the first clinic findings will still be followed because this is the protocol of the GAMCA clinic which is unfair. Unfortunately, your clinic denied my second opinion. In the second opinion I did, nothing significant or anything was found in my lungs.

I took a second opinion to another clinic because I doubted the findings because I had no history or any operation other than cessarian. 8 years ago (Translated by Google) I passed my x-ray pre-medical but when I took my final medical to one of your accredited clinics they diagnosed on my x-ray that I have minimal fibrosis.

Medical clinic accredited by gamca